080 suppliers and handlers boycott

methods of noncooperation economic noncooperation boycotts action by middlemen
080 suppliers and handlers boycott banner

"A suppliers’ and handlers’ boycott involves a refusal by workers or middlemen (wholesalers, jobbers and distributors) to handle or supply certain goods. The reasons for this refusal may include: 1) objection to the use to which the goods are to be put, such as by struck firms or in wars or by antipathetic regimes; 2) objection to the intrinsic nature of the goods; and 3) objection to the conditions under which the goods have been produced (slavery, Apartheid or oppression, or milder conditions deemed unfair to organized labor, such as sweatshops or employment of strikebreakers)."...

((Sharp, Gene. The Politics of Nonviolent Action (p. 256). Albert Einstein Institution. Kindle Edition.))

recommend Potentially awesome partners

020 prayer and worship

prayer and worship

trending_up 9.5/10 as a pair
group_work In 2 campaigns together
162 sit in

sit in

trending_up 8.7/10 as a pair
group_work In 3 campaigns together
003 declarations by organizations and institutions

declarations by organizations and institutions

trending_up 7.9/10 as a pair
group_work In 9 campaigns together

warning Potentially problematic matches

026 paint as protest

paint as protest

trending_down 3.0/10 as a pair
group_work In 1 campaigns together
138 sitdown

sitdown

trending_down 3.0/10 as a pair
group_work In 1 campaigns together
013 deputations

deputations

trending_down 4.0/10 as a pair
group_work In 1 campaigns together

High scoring campaigns using this method

Historical cases from the Nonviolent Action Database that used this method

LGBTQ+ Advocates and Corporate Boycotts on Indiana Senate Bill 101, 2015

10.0/10

On 26 March, 2015, U.S. Republican Governor Mike Pence signed Bill 101 into state law after the State Senate approved it by a vote of 40-10. The law, officially titled the “Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act” (RFRA), was set to take effect on ...

Southern Africans block arms shipment for Zimbabwe, 2008

10.0/10

Once celebrated as a symbol of anti-colonial struggle, Zimbabwe degenerated into a state of chaos during the turn of the 21st century after decades of internal struggle. During the thirty-year rule of Robert Mugabe’s Zimbabwe African National Union-P...

Bardoli peasants campaign against the Government of Bombay, 1928

10.0/10

The Bombay Government (through its Revenue Department) had, in 1927, enhanced the land revenue assessment in the Bardoli taluka (county) by a nominal 22 percent, which, when applied, amounted in some cases to as much as 60 percent enhancement. This t...

British Steel Workers defend wages against threatened decrease, 1980

9.0/10

0 0 1 763 4355 Swarthmore College 36 10 5108 14.0\n\nNormal 0\n\nfalse false false\n\nEN-US JA X-NONE\n\n/* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-nosh...

U.S. west coast longshoremen strike for union recognition and San Francisco general strike, 1934

9.0/10

The San Francisco general strike grew out of a coast-wide maritime strike in which ports up and down the west coast of the United States were closed by striking workers. While there were complaints about wages and working conditions, the strikers (he...

Hawaiian longshoremen win 177-day strike in Hawai'i', 1949

9.0/10

By 26 January 1949, negotiations between the International Longshoreman’s Worker Union (ILWU) and the longshoreman employers had reached a standstill. Leaders Jack Hall, Harry Bridges, and Louis Goldblatt negotiated for pay raises for the Hawaii long...

U.S. farmworkers in California campaign for economic justice (Grape Strike), 1965-70

9.0/10

Before the grape strike in 1965, the average annual income of a California farmworker was less than $1,400. In addition, variations in weather or market patterns could lessen this amount. Working conditions were also poor, as many workers did not hav...

Iranians overthrow the Shah, 1977-79

9.0/10

Agitation in Iran was visible by May 1977 in predominantly intellectual circles. A group of lawyers—upset by the government’s interference in the judiciary—drafted a strongly worded manifesto chronicling the legal abuses that had occurred under the S...

Liverpool, England, dockers win strike with major international support, 1995-1998

9.0/10

On 28 September 1995 the Mersey Docks and Harbour Company fired 329 port workers in Liverpool, England, for joining a picket line in solidarity with fellow port workers in Torside. The Torside workers were fired for protesting against the “free-marke...

Zanzibar workers general strike in Zanzibar City, Tanzania, 1948

8.0/10

Zanzibar, a former colony of Great Britain, is an island off the coast of Tanzania, located in East Africa. Under British rule the population of Zanzibar was divided between small but influential groups of Arabs, Indians, and Europeans and the two la...

Low scoring campaigns using this method

Historical cases from the Nonviolent Action Database that used this method

British printers strike for their jobs, unions (Wapping Dispute), 1986-1987

3.0/10

By 1986, Australian Rupert Murdoch was already well on his way to becoming the head of what would be the world’s largest news conglomerate, News International. His meteoric rise to the top, however, clashed with a centuries-old printing tradition in ...

Hawaiians strike against Inter-Island Steam Navigation Company Limited, 1938

3.0/10

Hawaiian workers attempting to organize unions in the 1920s and 1930s faced enormous difficulties. They met stern opposition from an alliance of plantation owners and large companies, including the Inter-Island Steam Navigation Company. Hawaiian work...

Effectiveness profile

Success by Opponent
Corporation / Business 7.6
Government / State Body 6.7
Healthcare Provider 9.0
Judiciary / Legal System 9.0
Success by Theme
Success by Group Type
Success by Region
Success by Campaign Scale
Success by Goal Magnitude

Risk profile

Risk by region

Compared to the worldwide average for this method

Africa
skull
Lethal Force and Harm trending_flat Average
personal_injury
Physical Assault (Non-Lethal) trending_flat Average
gavel
Arrests and Legal Action trending_flat Average
campaign
Intimidation and Harassment arrow_upward Higher
lock
Restrictions on Rights and Freedoms trending_flat Average
house_siding
Property Damage and Economic Reprisals trending_flat Average
Americas
Asia
Europe
Oceania

Risk by regime

Compared to the worldwide average for this method

Closed autocracy
Electoral autocracy
Electoral democracy
Liberal democracy